Tuesday, December 31, 2019

A Personal Statement about the Things I Have Learned in...

The issues, ideas, concepts, and facts I learned in this course have stimulated my imagination and ability to think critically. I have been intrigued most by learning about art through history, from Caravaggio to Munch. The topic that confused and bothered me the most was related to the American Civil War, which illuminates the dark side of the countrys history. Because of my future ambitions, I believe that our understanding of why Hollywood became the center of the movie industry over other cities is useful knowledge to me personally. However, I also believe that checking historical facts and verifying knowledge will become critical in my future career. The questions I would most like to ask my classmates in this course include those related to the painter Caravaggio because of the unique way the painter renders light and shadow. Painting has always intrigued me, because of the astonishing breadth and variety evident in art throughout history. In this course, we learned about en plein air, or open air painting traditions in Europe and the United States. The en plein air techniques are taken for granted now because we see painters working outside regularly. However, before the nineteenth century, it was relatively rare to see artists with their easels and paint palettes working out of doors. The work artists did was confined to their studios. Even with en plein air painters, studios are places where the artist performs much of their craft. Artists will create and blendShow MoreRelatedWhy I Am A English?947 Words   |  4 Pagesskills that I can now apply to future writing projects. Among many things, the three lessons that I got the most use out of are the following; how to correctly structure an essay, different methods of writing, and the personal growth that I’ve had since taking this class. With En glish being my second language, it is difficult for me to express myself in writing form. It is extremely frustrating to have countless ideas and opinions that I would like to share with an audience, but because I am not comfortableRead MoreWhat I Learned About My English Class During My Senior Year Of High School1248 Words   |  5 PagesOver the course of time, I have learned that learning is essential if you want to be successful. Whether it is about life skills or school, learning is a habit that everyone uses in a way to become successful. One of my main goals is to obtain the most out of college so that I can input what I learn in school in the outside world. Meaning that I want to learn as much as I possibly can in any course, especially in this course. I expected this course to be a review of my English class during my seniorRead MorePersonal Review And Reflection Paper1262 Words   |  6 PagesPersonal Review and Reflection Paper During the journey of my education, it was important to review and reflect on the activities and learning objectives that were completed. The purpose of this assignment was to discuss what was learned and what needed to be improved for the seven assignments that were required for this course, identify three valuable strengths with supporting evidence, identify three areas that need to be strengthened with supporting evidence, and list three goals with specificRead MoreCritical Analysis Skills Developed Through Writing a Reflection Paper870 Words   |  4 Pageson my experience in this course, I was not sure what to write. I struggled with the idea that I had to write my feelings down about what I had learned in a class that I had to read literature and then interpret those readings into journal entries addressed to my fellow students. This left me a little intimidated. So to start the ideas flowing, I went back to the beginning. I looked up the â€Å"Week One Letter† to the student and re-read the description and goal of the course. Dr. Doe stated in theRead MoreMy Educational And Career Pathways1573 Words   |  7 Pagesthe course. Throughout this course, I have learned abut the work world, and different laws and regulations. I have been able to reflect on skills and work habits, learn more about resumes and cover letters. I have also been fortunate to learn about a key aspect of becoming employed; interviews. One of the major things I have learned and discovered are, my educational and career pathways for the future. In this course, I have learned quite a bit about the work world. I have learned thatRead MoreCapstone Course : Learning On Structuring A Business1163 Words   |  5 Pagesin learning on structuring a business. I was hesitant throughout my sessions on how to proceed; however, after researching the web and corresponding with the session requirements, I was able to gain and improve a new insight of knowledge. I appreciated the diverse topics that the Capstone course presented. I agreed with the assignments for each session. What I disagreed with was not having thread discussions (besides session 8). In the past, I have learned different background experiences and perspectivesRead MoreOrganizational Behavior : An Organization1521 Words   |  7 PagesOrganizational Behavior (OB) entails the study and usage of knowledge about how individuals, people, as well as groups function in organizations (Luthans Yousseff, 2007). Using a systematic approach, organizational behavior interprets people/organization relations in terms of the groups, individuals, entire organization, and social system. The main objective of organizational behavior is to help find or develop better relationships by attaining human objectives, social objectives and ultimatelyRead MoreInternational Business Reflection812 Words   |  4 Pagesremember this is a management course and not an academic seminar. We are particularly intereste d in your management insights and not just your ability to show us that you have read the book. Make the links to the book, concepts, etc. where appropriate. 5. Include a â€Å"Going Forward† section about how you can apply what you have learned to your world outside the classroom and/or change how you have been doing things. Introduction Of all of the courses I have taken thus far I felt that I have takenRead MoreI Am A Senior At Baruch College1385 Words   |  6 Pages I was a college graduate and was hired as treasurer in China. After I immigrated to New York, I knew that I have to back into school, because everything in the past is just like a piece of white paper once I entered a new country. I need a chance to start again, to rebuild my life. Currently, I am a senior at Baruch College, and my major is accounting. I transferred to this school from Borough of Manhattan Community College, and already have a goal that I want to be an accountant. I had taken numerousRead MoreEnglish 111 Evaluation Essay623 Words   |  3 Pagesacademic writing. This is a prerequisite English class for higher-level English education. By the end of this course a student will have gained a great deal of practice in the craft of writing. This essay will evaluate the English 111 textbooks, essays, self-reflections, the instructor, and what I personally learned. The English 111 textbook had effective sample essays and diagrams of outlines. The Successful College Writing Textbook is the textbook used for the English 111 course. This textbook had

Monday, December 23, 2019

Resource Allocation Paper - 2424 Words

Resource Allocation Paper Jody Bryant, Vann Haigler, Rose Matos, and James Sampson University of Phoenix Mark Fechtel May 25, 2006 Resource Allocation Paper Project management is the discipline of defining and achieving targets while optimizing the use of resources: time, money, people, materials, energy, space, etc., over the course of a project. The most important resources that project managers have to plan and manage on day-to-day basis are people, materials, equipment and working capital. Obviously, if these resources are available in abundance then the project could be accelerated to achieve shorter project duration. On the other hand, [Avoid using colloquial language, slang or jargon in formal†¦show more content†¦She will be responsible for overseeing Big Time Builders, Keep-em Happy Architectural, Martin Grading, and other of contractors such as electrical, plumbing, mechanical, and industrial engineers. James Vann Haigler is functional manager over quality assurance. Vann, as he prefers to be called, has an extensive background in quality assurance management, which includes a Bachelor of Sci ence in Business Administration, specializing in Computer Science. He has over 13 years of experience in QA, 3D graphics applications. Vann reports to James Sampson, and is responsible for the overall management of activities related to the sampling, and release of raw materials and components. This includes, but is not limited to, writing of specifications and SOPs, control of artwork, shop floor testing, resolution of Sub-standard Material Reports, and maintenance of vendor files. He guarantees a level of quality for the end client, and is focused on creating a quality deliverable. Task and Responsibility Matrix After the project is organized, there is a need to define what roles and responsibilities for each member of Team B. Within the project the labor will not be specificity be accomplished by the team members but from sub-contractors, however each task must be carried out in order to complete the project. [This sentence is confusing. Reword for clarity] In order to insure that all tasks areShow MoreRelatedEfficient Resource Allocation In Cognitive Radio Networks1101 Words   |  5 PagesEfficient resource allocation in cognitive radio networks considering time varying constraints Abstract: Wide spread acceptance of wireless technologies has given rise to increase in demand for bandwidth .cognitive radio was developed as a promising technique to overcome the scarcity of spectrum resources in wireless communication. The term cognitive radio is defined as an intelligent radio that can be programmed and configured dynamically. Particular portion of the spectrum can be used only byRead MoreHealth Care Budget Paper1149 Words   |  5 PagesHealth Care Budget Paper Financial Management means planning, organizing, directing and controlling the financial activities such as procurement and utilization of funds for an organization. It means applying general management principles to financial resources of the enterprise or organization. The scope of financial management can cut across a wide range of the organizations departments and can involve investment decisions including investment in fixed assets. Investment in current assetsRead MoreBSBMGT515A: Manage Operational Plan Essay1281 Words   |  6 Pagesincludes projects to be undertaken, actions, resource policies, responsibilities and timeframes. It outlines the actions teams/individuals within an organisation will take to achieve its objectives and also outlines any major projects within the relative time period. An operational plan will contain details of: †¢ Organisational structure †¢ Short- or medium-term business strategies †¢ Major projects †¢ Available resources (including human and physical resources, also financial) †¢ Performance targets Read MoreA Report On Energy Efficiency1268 Words   |  6 Pagesequipment (UE). Consider the scenario in which the access point (AP) serves a subset of UEs when available resources cannot support all of the UEs’ quality-of-service (QoS) requirements. In this project, propose a scheduling metric to balance the tradeoff between EE and fairness. Based on the scheduling metric, propose a suboptimal joint scheduling and resource allocation algorithm and a power allocation algorithm that maximizes the system EE. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can achieveRead MoreCommon Sense Economics Paper709 Words   |  3 PagesCommon Sense Economics Paper With the recent developments in the economy there could have not been a better time to pick up this book and read it. I work for a financial institution which had received a good amount of TARP funds. This was followed by media on the company’s allocation of resources for what appears to be a recreational purchase equaling almost the amount of TARP funding. In turn to find out company â€Å"x† had decided that employees will not be receiving a compensation Read MoreBoeing Company1159 Words   |  5 PagesBoeing Company MGT 330 April 08, 2011 Organizing Paper One reason why so many organizations succeed and be able to sustain their long-term goals is their effective and efficient organizational ability. The organizing function of management involves the allocation of the company resources. When the management of the organization allocates its resources with strategic planning and execution in mind, the organization can successfully satisfy the requirements of both internal andRead MoreAdvances in Cellular Communication1429 Words   |  6 Pagesconsumptions as in [5]. The D2D communications proposed for different time slot and same frequency used and carefully managed interference, reducing Base station traffic and minimizing transmission power. The different power saving mechanism in Radio Resource Management (RRM), power control is very important for cellular networks and beneficial to link in adaptation, interference reduction. Depending off on time of day or geographic location BS may be an idle but mobile terminal not negativ ely affectedRead MoreResource Allocation for Quantity of Information Delivery in Parallel Channels753 Words   |  3 Pages\cite{PARK12, TS102706_13}. In this paper we only focus on the energy efficiency in relation to capacity. With delay tolerant applications and networks, the constraint on the time of transmission can be relaxed~\cite{FALL03, BOLL11} and the solution to the problem of minimizing the transmit energy leads to the use of an infinite time of transmission. However, from a information theoretic point of view, it becomes interesting to study and develop resource allocation schemes that ensure reliable communicationsRead MoreThe University Of Texas At Arlington1023 Words   |  5 Pages5194 Assignment Critique on Non-cooperative, Semi-cooperative, and Cooperative Games-based Grid Resource Allocation (Samee Ullah Khan and Ishfaq Ahmad Department of Computer Science and Engineering University of Texas at Arlington, TX-76019, U.S.A. {sakhan, iahmad}@cse.uta.edu) Simranjeet Kaur UTA ID: 1001237306 Non-cooperative, Semi-cooperative, and Cooperative Games-based Grid Resource Allocation Straightforward access to large-scale distributed computational assets is provided by computationalRead MoreNigerias Public Service Reform Process: Human Resource Issues6126 Words   |  25 PagesService Reform Process: Human Resource Issues By M J Balogun 2003 1 Contents Table 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Abstract .................................................................................................. 3 Human Resources and National Development ...................................... 4 Problems in Human Resource Development and Utilization: a Review of Policies and Practices...................................................................... 10 Human Resource Development and Utilization:

Sunday, December 15, 2019

Chapter 18 Solutions Free Essays

EXERCISE 18-1 (10-15 minutes) Add or deduct from accounting income (a)2deduct (b)1add (c)3add (d)1add (e)2deduct (f)2deduct (g)1add (h3deduct (i)3deduct (j)1add (k)1add (l)1add EXERCISE 18-3 (15-20 minutes) (a) Accounting income$105,000 Permanent differences: Non-deductible fines 11,000 116,000 Timing differences: Excess of CCA over amortization (16,000) Excess rent collected over rent earned? 24,000 Taxable income$124,000 Current income taxes – 30% $37,200 (b) Deductible Balance(Taxable)Future TaxCurrent SheetTemporaryTax AssetLong- AccountDifferencesXRate(Liability)Term PP E($16,000)*30%($4,800) LT Unearned Rent revenue 24,00030% 7,200C Future income tax asset, Dec. 31, 20092,400 Future income tax asset before adjustment 0 Incr. in future income tax asset and future income tax benefit for 2009$2,400 *Carrying amount and tax basis are not given in the exercise, only the net difference (c)Current Income Tax Expense37,200 Income Tax Payable37,200 Future Income Tax Asset? 7,200* Future Income Tax Benefit2,400 Future Income Tax Liability? 4,800* *or a net debit to Future Income Tax Asset of $2,400 Because of a flat tax rate, these totals can be reconciled: $24,000 – $16,000) X 30% = $7,200 + ($4,800). We will write a custom essay sample on Chapter 18 Solutions or any similar topic only for you Order Now EXERCISE 18-3 (Continued) (d)Income before income taxes$105,000 Income tax expense Current$37,200 Future benefit? (2,400)? 34,800 Net income$70,200 (e) Divided by Accounting @ 30% Income Accounting income $ 105,000 31,500 30. 0% Non-deductible fines 11,000 3,300 3. 1% 34,800 33. 1% Effective tax rate ($34,800/$105,000)33. 1% (f)Current assets Future income tax asset$7,200 Non-Current liabilities Future Income Tax Liability4,800 EXERCISE 18-9 (15-20 minutes) (a) Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2008AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Warranty liability($130,000)$0 $130,000 25%$32,500 Future income tax asset, December 31, 200832,500 Future income tax asset before adjustment 0 Increase in future income tax asset and future income tax benefit for 2008$32,500 Future years Total200920102011 Deductible temporary difference Warranty liability $130,000 $50,000 $35,000 $45,000 Tax rate enacted for the year 25%25%25% Future tax asset $32,500 $12,500 $8,750 $11,250 EXERCISE 18-9 (Continued) (b)2008 Accounting income$135,000 Permanent differences:-0- Timing difference: Warranty expense warranty costs incurred 130,000 Taxable income 265,000 Current income taxes – 25%$66,250 (c) Current Income Tax Expense66,250 Income Tax Payable 66,250 Future Income Tax Asset32,500 Future Income Tax Benefit32,500 (d)Income before income taxes$135,000 Income tax expense Current$66,250 Future benefit? (32,500) 33,750 Net income$101,250 EXERCISE 18-15 (40-45 minutes) (a) Basic Calculations of Capital Cost Allowance, Amounts and Balances: C-B (A)(B)A – B(C)Timing YearBaseCCAUCCAmort. NBVDifference 2007 $600,000 X 40 % X . $ 120,000 $ 480,000 $120,000$480,000$0 2008 480,000 X 40 % 192,000 288,000 120,000360,000(72,000) 2009 288,000 X 40 % 115,200 172,800 120,000240,0004,800 2010 172,800 X 40 % 69,120 103,680 120,000120,00050,880 2011 103,680 X 40 % 41,472 62,208120,000078,528 $537,792 (b) 20072008200920102011 Accounting income $ 340,000 $340,000 $340,000 $340,000 $ 340,000 Timing difference – (72,000) 4,8 00 50,880 78,528 Taxable income $ 340,000 $268,000 $344,800 $390,880 $ 418,528 X 34 %X 34 %X 34 %X 34 %X 34 % Income taxes payable$115,600$91,120$117,232$132,899$142,300 EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (c) and (d) 2007 Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2007AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment$480,000 $480,000 034%$0 Future income tax asset/liability, December 31, 20070 Future income tax asset/liability before adjustment 0 Increase in future income tax liability and future income tax expense for 2007$0 Current Income Tax Expense115,600 Income Taxes Payable? 115,600 ($340,000 X 34%) part (a) EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (c) and (d) continued 008 Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2008AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment$360,000$288,000 (72,000)34%($24,480) Future income tax liability, December 31, 2008(24,480) Future income tax liability before adjustment 0 Increase in future income tax liability and future income tax expense for 2008($ 24,480) Current Income Tax Expense91,120 Income Taxes Payable? 91,120 ($268,000 X 34%) part (a) Future Income Tax Expense24,480 Future Income Tax Liability? 24,480 EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (c) and (d) continued 2009 Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2009AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment$240,000$172,800 ($67,200)34%($22,848) Future income tax liability, December 31, 2009(22,848) Future income tax liability before adjustment (24,480) Decrease in future income tax liability and future income tax benefit for 2009$1,632 2009 Current Income Tax Expense117,232 Income Taxes Payable? 117,232 ($344,800 X 34%) part (a) Future Income Tax Liability1,632 Future Income Tax Benefit? 1,632 EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (c) and (d) continued 2010 Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2010AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment$120,000$103,680 ($16,320)34%($5,549) Future income tax liability, December 31, 2010(5,549) Future income tax liability before adjustment (22,848) Decrease in future income tax liability and future income tax benefit for 2010$17,299 2010 Current Income Tax Expense132,899 Income Taxes Payable? 132,899 ($390,880 X 34%) part (a) Future Income Tax Liability17,299 Future Income Tax Benefit? 17,299 EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (c) and (d) continued 2011 Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2011AmountBasisDifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment$0$62,208 $62,20834%$21,151 Future income tax asset, December 31, 201121,151 Future income tax liability before adjustment (5,549) Increase in future income tax asset and future income tax benefit for 2011$26,700 2011 Current Income Tax Expense142,300 Income Taxes Payable? 142,300 ($418,528 X 34%) part (a) Future Income Tax Liability5,549* Future Income Tax Asset21,151* Future Income Tax Benefit? 26,700 *Alternately, a debit to Future Tax Asset26,700 EXERCISE 18-15 (Continued) (e) 2007 Current Income Tax Expense115,600 Income Taxes Payable? 115,600 ($340,000 X 34%) 2008 Current Income Tax Expense91,120 Income Taxes Payable? 91,120 ($268,000 X 34%) 2009 Current Income Tax Expense117,232 Income Taxes Payable? 117,232 ($344,800 X 34%) 2010 Current Income Tax Expense132,899 Income Taxes Payable? 132,899 ($390,880 X 34%) 2011 Current Income Tax Expense142,300 Income Taxes Payable? 142,300 ($418,528 X 34%) PROBLEM 18-9 Part 1. (a) Mixed tax rates Future years 20092010201120122013Total Future taxable amounts ($300) ($300) ($300) ($200) ($100) ($1,200) Tax rate enacted for the year 30%30%30%35%35% Future tax (liability) ($90) ($90) ($90) ($70) ($35) ($375) Future years 20092010201120122013Total Future deductible amounts $1,800 $1,800 Tax rate enacted for the year 30%30%30%35%35% Future tax asset – – – $ 630 – $ 630 PROBLEM 18-9 (Continued) Part 1. (a) Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2008Amount*Basis*DifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment($1,200)Mixed($375) Litigation Liability1,800Mixed630 Future income tax asset, December 31, 2008255 Future income tax liability before adjustment (500) Increase in future income tax asset and future income tax benefit for 2008$755 * not given in the problem Part 1. part (b) Current Income Tax Expense1,200 Income Tax Payable1,200 ($4,000 X 30%) Future Income Tax Asset/Liability755 Future Income Tax Benefit755* *Alternately: Future Income Tax Asset630 Future Income Tax Liability125 Future Income Tax Benefit755 PROBLEM 18-9 (Continued) Part 2. (a) Mixed tax rates Future years 2009201020112012Total Future taxable amounts ($400) ($400) ($400) ($400) ($1,600) Tax rate enacted for the year 30%30%30%35% Future tax (liability) ($120) ($120) ($120) ($140) ($500) Future years 2009201020112012Total Future deductible amounts $3,000 $3,000 Tax rate enacted for the year 30%30%30%35% Future tax asset – – $900 – $900 PROBLEM 18-9 (Continued) Part 2. (a) Balance Deductible Sheet (Taxable) Future Tax AccountCarryingTaxTemporaryTaxAsset Dec. 31, 2008Amount*Basis*DifferencesRate(Liability) Property Plant Equipment($1,600)Mixed($500) Litigation Liability3,000Mixed900 Future income tax asset, December 31, 2008400 Future income tax asset before adjustment 600 Decrease in future income tax asset and future income tax expense for 2008$200 * not given in the problem Part 2. part (b) Current Income Tax Expense1,200 Income Tax Payable1,200 ($4,000 X 30%) Future Income Tax Expense200* Future Income Tax Asset200* *Alternately: Future Income Tax Expense200 Future Income Tax Asset300 Future Income Tax Liability500 PROBLEM 18-9 (Continued) (c) Part 1 – All balance sheet related accounts are non-current Pirates Corp. Balance Sheet December 31, 2008 Non-current assets Future income tax asset$255 Part 2 – All balance sheet related accounts are non-current Eagles Corp. Balance Sheet December 31, 2008 Non-current assets Future income tax asset$400 PROBLEM 18-12 (a)2007 Income Tax Refund Receivable—20047,500 ($25,000 X 30%) Income Tax Refund Receivable—200518,000 ?($60,000 X 30%) Income Tax Refund Receivable—200632,000 ($80,000 X 40%) Current Income Tax Benefit (Due to Loss Carryback)57,500 Note:An acceptable alternative is to record only one Income Tax Refund Receivable account for the amount of $57,500. Future Income Tax Asset18,000 Future Income Tax Benefit (Due to Loss Carryforward)18,000 ($210,000 – $25,000 – $60,000 – $80,000 = $45,000) ($45,000 X 40% = $18,000) 2008 Current Income Tax Expense10,000 Income Tax Payable? 10,000 [($70,000 – $45,000) X 40%] Future Income Tax Expense18,000 Future Income Tax Asset18,000 ($18,000 – $0) 2009 Current Income Tax Expense31,500 Income Tax Payable ($90,000 X 35%)31,500 PROBLEM 18-12 (Continued) (b)One or more income tax refund receivable accounts totalling $57,500 will be reported under current assets on the balance sheet at December 31, 2007. This type of receivable is usually listed immediately above inventory in the current asset section. This receivable is normally collec ¬tible within two months of filing the amendment to the tax returns reflecting the carryback. A future income tax asset of $18,000 should also be classified as a current asset because the benefits of the loss carryforward are expected to be realized in the year that immediately follows the loss year, which means the benefits are expected to be realized in 2008. A current future income tax asset is usually listed at or near the end of the list of current assets on the balance sheet. Also, retained earnings is increased by $75,500 ($57,500 + $18,000) as a result of the entries to record the benefits of the loss carryback and the loss carryforward. (c)2007 Income Statement Operating loss before income taxes($210,000) Income tax benefit Current benefit due to loss carryback$57,500 Future benefit due to loss carryforward? 18,000 75,500 Net loss($134,500) (d)2008 Income Statement Income before income taxes$70,000 Income tax expense Current$10,000a Future? 18,000? 28,000 Net income$42,000 a [($70,000 – $45,000) X 40%] PROBLEM 18-12 (Continued) (e)2007 Income Tax Refund Receivable—20047,500 ($25,000 X 30%) Income Tax Refund Receivable—200518,000 ($60,000 X 30%) Income Tax Refund Receivable—200632,000 ?($80,000 X 40%) Current Income Tax Benefit (Due to Loss Carryback)57,500 Note:An acceptable alternative is to record only one Income Tax Refund Receivable account for the amount of $57,500. Although the tax benefit is not recognized in the accounts, Mearat Inc. has a tax loss carryforward of $45,000 which should be disclosed. 2008 Current Income Tax Expense10,000 Income Tax Payable? 10,000 [($70,000 – $45,000) X 40%] 2009 Current Income Tax Expense31,500 Income Tax Payable ($90,000 X 35%)31,500 (f)2007: entry for current taxes – no change 2007: if a valuation allowance is used, the full benefit and future tax asset related to the tax loss carryforward is recognized and then offset by the allowance, as follows. Future Income Tax Asset18,000 Future Income Tax Benefit (Due to Loss Carryforward)18,000 ($45,000 X 40% = $18,000) Problem 18-12 (f) (Continued) Future Income Tax Expense18,000 Allowance to Reduce Future Income Tax Asset to Realizable Value)18,000 ($18,000 – $0) 2008: entry for current taxes – no change 2008: because the tax loss carryforward has now been used, both the amount in the future tax account and in its allowance account must be removed, as follows. Future Income Tax Expense (Due to Use of Loss Carryforward)18,000 Future Income Tax Asset18,000 Allowance to Reduce Future Income Tax Asset to Realizable Value18,000 Future Income Tax Benefit (from Adjustment of Allowance)18,000 Alternatively, one entry could have been made: Allowance to Reduce Future Income Tax Asset to Realizable Value18,000 Future Income Tax Asset18,000 2009: No change to part (e) entry. (g)2007 Income Statement Operating loss before income taxes($200,000) Income tax benefit Current benefit due to loss carryback? 57,500 Net loss($142,500) 2008 Income Statement Income before income taxes$70,000 Income tax expense – Current a 14,000 Net income$56,000 a [($70,000 – $35,000) X 40%] PROBLEM 18-12 (Continued) h)Using the valuation allowance instead of applying the reduction in value directly does not have any impact on cash flows. The use of the contra allowance simply permits the recording of the full benefits associated with all future deductible amounts in the asset account. This facilitates tracking for management purposes. It has no use for financial reporting purposes except, perhaps, for the transparency of the information. Readers can see the total possible benefits and the extent to which management has judged they will not be realized. Use of the allowance has no impact on cash flows. How to cite Chapter 18 Solutions, Essay examples

Saturday, December 7, 2019

Management Component Corporate Profitably â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Management Component Corporate Profitably? Answer: Introducation The primary setting up or establishment of a company depends on various factors but the ultimate binding factor is management. Even when the building for the organization is built, management at different levels of hierarchy is carried out in order to complete the task in a better way rather the best way. Therefore whatever may be the task, management at each and every level is a mandatory process. Similarly in case of an organization, the most fundamental procedure is planning. Planning by the managers regarding marketing strategies to be used, improvement programs to be implemented, scheduling the required employee trainings and other components require management. Therefore a major function of management is planning. But before implementing planning in management, it is very important for the managers to know as to what exactly the subject matter for planning. The subject matter for planning can only be known when it is clear as to what crisis or matter that requires planning will arise in the future. Management of corporate finance also requires proper planning (Agrawal and Matsa 2013). Corporate finance generally refers to all the financial functions that are implemented and practiced within a company. The professionals that are in charge of corporate financing inside an organization work with the objective of maximizing the profit earned and reducing the risk involved in an unexpected loss. Corporate financing also helps in understanding as to what is the best possible method to increase the revenue and also produce returns to the investors or shareholders (Mathuva 2015). Corporate decision making is related to capital budgeting in a way that it helps in decision making about investments. Capital budgeting is an important tool in relation to corporate finance management. Capital budgeting generates huge scope for financial managers to check and assess the various projects on the basis of the percentage of chances to be taken up for investments (Burns and Walker 2015). It also assists in bringing out the risk involved in different types of projects. It also becomes useful in keeping a check on the rate of investments. Finally the prospect of the business depends wholesomely on the optimum utilization of resources. There are a various capital budgeting techniques like net present value and internal rate of return, pay-back period method and accounting rate of return method (Hise and Strawser 2013). The pay-back period method refers to the time period under which the proposition will lead to generation of cash in order to make up for the initial investment made. It truly focuses on the inflow of cash, the projects economic life and the amount of investment made without the time value of money being considered (Bierman and Smidt 2012). The accounting rate of return method is based on the criteria that any proposition that has an accounting rate of return more than the assumed minimum rate prefixed by the management will be taken into account and the propositions below the accounting rate of return are refused. The net present value method is one of the widely used methods of capital budgeting. Under this method the inflow of cash that comes in at different points of time or that is expected at a certain point of time is given a discount at a particular rate. The time value of money is taken into consideration in this method. The internal rate of return method of capital budgeting technique can be defined as the rate, when the net present value of the investment is zero. Here in this method the discounted value of cash inflow is equal to the discounted value of cash outflow. This method also takes into account the time value of money (Hasan 2013). As asked in the question the sensitivity analysis concept in relation to capital budgeting technique is an analysis that measures the sensitivity of the variable that is dependent in relation to the change in an independent variable. In certain situations the historical data available may be used but if the historical data is not available then research has to be conducted. Essentially the sensitivity analysis refers to the entire result or outcome that changes due to change in a single variable. For instance a manufacturing company might as well find out that a change in a particular raw material may lead to a huge change in the cost of manufacturing. Sensitivity analysis actually projects the viability of the projects. Sensitivity analysis provides a view that more the fluctuations in the initial parameters of a certain proposition the less risk is involved in the project. Sensitivity analysis is generally required to identify the risky parameters, assess their numerical values and measure the consequences of assuming such risks. Experts are of the view that sensitivity analysis is used by managers to monitor and measure the changes in net present value due to a change in the variables used for calculating it. Application of sensitivity analysis may be used to assess situations as to when the net present value reflects a positive value and when it reflects a value that is negative. While conducting sensitivity analysis three areas should be kept in mind, that are, aggregate costs and benefits, critical cost and benefit item and the effect of delays during construction phase. The advantages of using sensitivity analysis are that a certain change in a single variable is very effective in measuring the economic worth of a project; scrutinizing the risk involved in a single project and thirdly the sensitivity analysis is universal in nature (Pianosi, Sarrazin and Wagener 2015). Scenario analysis refers to the analysis that is done when more than one assumption is attempted to change. Essentially scenario analysis is an extended version of sensitivity analysis. Sensitivity analysis may be extended in order to include changed number of variables at the same time. This is known as scenario analysis. However, the assumptions that can be changed and the extent up to which it can be changed is totally dependent on the particulars of the problem. The final and best approach is to observe what will happen at the extremes. The best scenario possible occurs when the outcome is much better than what was expected and in case of the worst scenario possible the outcomes become worse than expected. In order to assess a particular scenario the best or worst case or scenario is taken as the scale for comparison. In clearer terms the best or worst possible scenario that is recorded is used for determining the scenario of a particular case. Scenario analysis is useful for fir ms that make investments on a large scale because they assume high risk, therefore before investing comparisons must be done using the scenario analysis (Gyamfi and Krumdieck 2012). Until now no assessment has been done regarding the probabilities of various outcomes. Most of the times it is not possible to provide proper probabilities and it is only possible to predict that something might happen, or the probability of unexpected happenings might be assessed. However, if the proper knowledge is not available about the probabilities the advantage of the technology of computers can be utilized in order to improve upon the scenario analysis. If it is possible to know what the probabilities in case of each and every outcome are, and also the knowledge that how they are interlinked is available, it would be possible to arrive at a point where distribution of NPVs is done with the help of the process is known as simulation. This will definitely provide the probability of each possible NPV. This technique if implemented properly a discount rate can be used in regards to the uncertainty amount about the NPV. The risk involved in a project can be adjusted with the help of the simulation technique. There are essentially two ways to adjust the returns to a project in order to make it face a higher hurdle is increasing the rate of discount and reducing the payment that is more or less expected. It is very much possible to think about the rate of discount as containing a basic rate that is risk-free and an added premium that is dependent on the amount of risk involved that is higher the risk, higher is the premium. As the percentage of uncertainty is more, it will definitely lead to reduction in the Net Present Value of projects that involve a great deal of risk as the rate at which the future payments are discounted is high. Similarly, it is of the implications that projects should obviously have a higher Internal Rate of Return to exceed the hurdle rate (Regan et al., 2015). Break-even analysis is used for the for determining the exact location at which the total profit received is equal to the cost that is incurred with receiving the profit or revenue. The calculation of margin of safety is done with the help of the break-even analysis. The break-even point is the point within which the revenues may fall while they still remain above the break-even point. Break-even analysis is also referred to as analysis that is supply-side in nature. The effect of various price levels on demand is also not analyzed or taken into account. Break-even analysis involves three kinds of costs that are fixed costs, variable costs and semi-variable costs. A fixed cost is the cost that remains unaffected by change in the amount of goods and services produced. Variable costs are variable in nature that is the cost depends upon the output produced. Semi-variable cost is a mixture of fixed costs and variable costs. One of the disadvantages of break even analysis is that it leads to poor accounting decisions and this can be avoided by using NPV break-even analysis. Break-even analysis is a much handy tool that is used to scrutinize the inter-relationship between variable costs, fixed costs and returns. A break-even point generally can be used to predict or research the exact point when a particular investment shall result in a positive return and can also be chalked out graphically or by the help of using simple mathematics. Break-even analysis is advantageous from the point that it calculates the total amount of production at an already provided amount that is needful to cover all the costs (Ghahremani, Aghaie and Abedzadeh 2012) References Agrawal, A.K. and Matsa, D.A., 2013. Labor unemployment risk and corporate financing decisions. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), pp.449-470. Bierman Jr, H. and Smidt, S., 2012. The capital budgeting decision: economic analysis of investment projects. Routledge. Burns, R. and Walker, J., 2015. Capital budgeting surveys: the future is now. Ghahremani, M., Aghaie, A. and Abedzadeh, M., 2012. Capital budgeting technique selection through four decades: with a great focus on real option. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(17), p.98. Gyamfi, S. and Krumdieck, S., 2012. Scenario analysis of residential demand response at network peak periods. Electric Power Systems Research, 93, pp.32-38. Hasan, M., 2013. Capital budgeting techniques used by small manufacturing companies. Journal of Service Science and Management, 6(01), p.38. Hise, R.T. and Strawser, R.H., 2013. Application of Capital Budgeting Techniques to Marketing Operations. Readings in Managerial Economics: Pergamon International Library of Science, Technology, Engineering and Social Studies, p.419. Mathuva, D., 2015. The Influence of working capital management components on corporate profitability. Pianosi, F., Sarrazin, F. and Wagener, T., 2015. A Matlab toolbox for global sensitivity analysis. Environmental Modelling Software, 70, pp.80-85. Regan, C.M., Bryan, B.A., Connor, J.D., Meyer, W.S., Ostendorf, B., Zhu, Z. and Bao, C., 2015. Real options analysis for land use management: Methods, application, and implications for policy. Journal of environmental management, 161, pp.144-152.